About Me

Name: The Proud Liberal
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Liberalism Disproves Free Market Theory

Free market theory says that all participants will make rational, i.e., not emotional, decisions that will maximize their individual best interests. Therefore, free market theory says that liberals make rational decisions.
 
On the other hand conservatives consistently allege that liberals make emotional, i.e. non-rational, decisions. If conservatives are correct then free market theory is invalid.
 
Although it is tempting to have it both ways it is logically impossible. Either free market theory is correct and liberals make rational decisions or conservatives are right and liberals make emotional decisions. But both cannot be right.
 
A liberal's choice of government entitlements such as social security and medicare are legitimate choices. The free market cannot proscribe individuals from making rational choices to choose something other than the free market.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (7) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

America Deserves Fight Over Clintons

"Exactly why the American right hates the Clintons so fervidly remains a subject of debate among both political scientists and psychiatrists, but the persistence of those emotions is beyond dispute." From Joe Conason this morning in Salon.

I believe that the American electorate once again needs to immerse itself in that hatred during the 2008 presidential contest, with Hillary as the Democratic nominee. My hope is that it would serve as a great big emetic for America.

Hillary misstated when she cited "a vast right wing conspiracy." But I have no doubt that there existed before and during the Clinton presidency a "shared understanding" among conservative activists, driven by the anti-abortion conservative activists, but consisting of an opportunistic coalition including fiscal conservatives.

Perhaps the building conservative movement since Reagan simply reached a critical mass at this time. Many people for many years had been working tirelessly to destroy the American Welfare State: Vigerie, the tax guy, forget his name, Heritage Foundation, AEI, all felt that government was the enemy of freedom and now comes along the passion and burgeoning organization of the religious right and its obsession with abortion as "mass murder."

Perhaps they just all achieved this critical mass as Bill Clinton ascended to the presidency. But it is clear that there was a "shared understanding" that the right would do everything in its power to undermine and sabotage the Clinton presidency as a means to further their own ideological ambitions.

Part Two:

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Would Jesus have loved secularists?

Of course. But Romney doesn't. Come to think of it, neither do Town Hallists.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Romney supports religious test for presidency

He says you have to have one. Doesn't care what it is. Though I notice he didn't mention the Hari Krishnas or the religion in Florida that sacrifices dogs. No doubt he gives himself the right to label any religion he doesn't like a "cult," while deploring anyone who calls Mormonism a cult. But if you're an athiest in this country you don't have a president if Romney is elected.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Romney won't be president of all Americans

Just like Bush!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Insurance Company Worse Than Welfare State

Be thankful we have a Welfare State in charge of most everything rather than Insurance Companies. They're demanding the very secrets of my soul for me to do a 1035 exchange. I'd rather deal with the government any day.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (32) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Let's hold the debate, NOW

Let's hold the debate in Congress about whether "America is or should be a Christian Nation (perhaps that should be a Conservative Christian nation." Let's get it out of the self-referential closet here on TH and get it out into the open for public scrutiny. And let's be sure to get Joe Lieberman involved as well as that Jewish Israel lobby. And let's have a roll-call vote so we can see where each of our senators and congressmen stand.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

We aren't A Nation Of Laws

Certainly not in the way that conservatives endlessly repeat this homily. Laws are made by men. We make some good laws and we make some bad laws. But always laws are made in a political context and the people with the gold - you remember the Golden Rule, "those with the gold, rule" - those with the gold pour money into the political process to get laws passed which are in their interest.

Conservatives use the homily "we are a nation of laws" as if our laws are transcendentally derived from God. Not so. They're derived from a usually corrupt political process.

 

I offer this in the spirit of "speaking truth to conservatives."

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Remember the Socialist S&L Bailout?

Are my tax dollars still being redistributed to the capitalists who made poor decisions in the S&L industry? I've lost track. Socialism for the capitalists and the free market for the rest of us? Give me a break.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Did Blacks Get Irresponsible Over Night?

Let's dispense immediately with the idea that black Africans were responsible for being taken into slavery because of their poor values. I don't think slavers would take the time to sort potential slaves based on their values.

And let's fast forward a bit. It seems reasonable to assume that blacks were not personally responsible for the slave system in the United States, nor for Jim Crow and the discrimination in the U.S. right up on through the 1960s, when there were laws passed in education, voting and civil rights.

The two questions are: when did blacks become responsible for their poverty because of their poor values, typically unmarried teen age girls having babies; and did that happen overnight? Dennis Prager inexhaustively identifies black poverty with those particular values, or lack thereof.

What one must do with any conservative assertion is to ask: What is your base year? The usual conservative attitude is that at some point, let's say 1998 during the Clinton presidency,

 obstacles to blacks disappeared and any black had as much opportunity as any white to be successful. Thus, black poverty was not the result, in that base year and continuing through to day, of social structure barriers but could be confidently attributed to the culture of values possessed by poor blacks.

 

Other questions are tempting, such as: were blacks always personally irresponsible but was this overshadowed by social barriers and when the barriers were lifted the personal irresponsibility remained and became visible for all to see?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pork Barrel Spending Is Socialism

"Take from those who have and distribute according to those in need." Any Republican congressman or senator who asks for pork barrel spending is asking to live in a socialist United States. I hope Hillary points this out in the general election, that any legislator who does not want to live in a socialist state had better quit pork barrelling cold turkey. Or else they should shut up about Hillary being a socialist, since that is exactly what they are too.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Forces Of Reaction Against Hillary

Should anyone but Hillary become president it will be proof that the forces of reaction have prevailed and it will be a sad, backward sliding day for America.

The affirming of Hillary as president will be the affirming of America. Her voice, her laugh, her manner and personality are all grist for the reactionaries mill. Charges of socialism.

The American Reactionaries will not debate her policies. They are too weak kneed and cowardly to do so.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

On the subject of Political Correctness

Conservatives make a "category error" about what it means to be a nation. As the economist Samuelson pointed out what is good for one company in an industry is not necessarily good for the industry or the country as a whole.

Certain speech, while upholding a "freedom of speech" standard which is good for one group of people in the United States is not good for another group of people and, therefore, is not good for us as a nation. Just about every quibble conservatives have about political correctness constitutes an error about what is good for the nation.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (11) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The "Stop Hannity Express."

Watch for my new bumper sticker around town, now folks. It's not a sin to hate a hater.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

We Need an impartial panel on Swift Boat

The evidence is available and is not ambiguous. An impartial panel can lay the issue to rest and work toward creating a more civil attitude among Americans of all political persuasions. Boone Pickens and everyone else involved owe it to America to settle this once and for all in an impartial forum. Let every American see the evidence for themselves and follow the discussions of the panel. We did it for OJ, why not for ourselves?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive